Are 'time' and 'motion' the same? If not how to they differ? Does time always produce motion or is 'ever in motion' the natural progression of time. Is time a fictional construct made by man to secure an infinite quantity of stationary incidents in frozen stasis? "This happened on January 20, 2001" for instance. Or "Today everything will be different from this moment forward."
Can you have 'time' and 'still'? I think so. In fact I know so. I've been experiencing 'time' and 'still' for twenty minutes twice a day for the last 37 years. Maybe not for every instant of the 20 minutes – but certainly now and then.
I think time is real enough. Very real in fact – the most real construct in the history of consciousness becoming conscious. Time makes it all happen in a precise and clock ticking kind of way. Which it's why it will be interesting from today - to see if the moment being set in motion – will be a significant change from the past which is ending. I certainly hope so!
Good luck Barack! And forget all this "hit the ground running" malarkey – just be STILL for a few minutes first if you possibly can.
No comments:
Post a Comment